002594.SZ vs 9988.HK

BYD Company against Alibaba Group Holding Limited — live side-by-side technical comparison.

Prices as of 2026-09-24T06:36:12+00:00 UTC · updates daily

Who leads right now

9988.HK leads 4 of the 5 windows we measure — over 1 month 002594.SZ is -7.7% and 9988.HK -3.2%; over year to date 002594.SZ is -13.7% and 9988.HK -22.5%. The 002594.SZ/9988.HK price ratio stands at 0.7633, below its 50-day average of 0.7774, and above the 200-day average of 0.7345. A ratio above its own average means 002594.SZ is gaining on 9988.HK; on this reading the recent edge belongs to 9988.HK.

Performance side by side

002594.SZ9988.HK
Price$84.35 $110.50
1 day -1.8% +0.6%lead
5 days -0.7% +5.1%lead
1 month -7.7% -3.2%lead
6 months -20.9% -10.3%lead
Year to date -13.7%lead -22.5%
52-week position 19% of range 22% of range
52-week range $77.60–$112.48 $88.65–$186.20
vs 50-day average below $89.47 below $115.34
vs 200-day average below $93.88 below $129.84
RSI (14) 39 51
Next earnings 2025-08-262026-11-24

Where each one stands

002594.SZ — BYD Company

002594.SZ trades at $84.35, below its 50-day average of $89.47, and below the 200-day at $93.88. It sits at 19% of its 52-week range ($77.60–$112.48); 14-day RSI is 39, in neutral territory; an average session moves it about 1.9%. For levels, the first level overhead is $88.50 (4.9% away) and the first support below is $80.00 (5.2% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 1 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bearish.

9988.HK — Alibaba Group Holding Limited

9988.HK trades at $110.50, below its 50-day average of $115.34, and below the 200-day at $129.84. It sits at 22% of its 52-week range ($88.65–$186.20); 14-day RSI is 51, in neutral territory; an average session moves it about 3.1%. For levels, the first level overhead is $115.34 (4.4% away) and the first support below is $100.00 (9.5% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 2 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bearish.

Which one moves harder

9988.HK is the more volatile of the two — an average session moves it 3.1% against 1.9% for 002594.SZ, so an identical position size carries roughly 1.6× the daily risk.

What would change the picture

The comparison turns on those levels: 002594.SZ clearing $88.50 or losing $80.00; 9988.HK clearing $115.34 or losing $100.00. Until one of them gives way, the relative reading above stands.

Questions people ask about 002594.SZ vs 9988.HK

Which is performing better right now, 002594.SZ or 9988.HK?
Over the past month 002594.SZ is -7.7% and 9988.HK is -3.2%, so 9988.HK is ahead on that window. Year to date the figures are -13.7% for 002594.SZ and -22.5% for 9988.HK.
Is 002594.SZ or 9988.HK more volatile?
9988.HK is the more volatile of the two — an average session moves it 3.1% against 1.9% for 002594.SZ, so an identical position size carries roughly 1.6× the daily risk.
What are the key levels for 002594.SZ and 9988.HK?
002594.SZ: resistance $88.50, support $80.00; 9988.HK: resistance $115.34, support $100.00. Levels come from recent swing zones and round numbers, recomputed daily.
When do 002594.SZ and 9988.HK report next?
002594.SZ: 2025-08-26. 9988.HK: 2026-11-24. Earnings reset both the trend and the levels above, so a comparison made today is only good until the next report.
What does the 002594.SZ/9988.HK ratio mean?
It is simply 002594.SZ's price divided by 9988.HK's — 0.7633 today. When the ratio rises, 002594.SZ is outperforming; when it falls, 9988.HK is. Comparing it to its own 50- and 200-day averages shows whether the current leadership is new or long-standing.

Full technical reads

002594.SZ →
BYD Company
Full technical read: trend, levels, chart, news
9988.HK →
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
Full technical read: trend, levels, chart, news

Related comparisons

AMZN vs TSLAAMZN vs HD9988.HK vs AMZNAMZN vs BABAAMZN vs MC.PAAMZN vs ITX.MCHD vs TSLA9988.HK vs TSLA