002594.SZ vs MC.PA

BYD Company against LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne — live side-by-side technical comparison.

Prices as of 2026-09-24T05:36:03+00:00 UTC · updates daily

Performance side by side

	002594.SZ	MC.PA
Price	$84.66	$396.90
1 day	-1.4%	-1.3%lead
5 days	-0.4%lead	-3.4%
1 month	-7.3%lead	-13.6%
6 months	-20.6%	-14.9%lead
Year to date	-13.4%lead	-38.5%
52-week position	20% of range	0% of range
52-week range	$77.60–$112.48	$396.35–$654.70
vs 50-day average	below $89.47	below $450.43
vs 200-day average	below $93.88	below $502.36
RSI (14)	40	28
Next earnings	2025-08-26	2026-07-27

Where each one stands

002594.SZ — BYD Company

002594.SZ trades at $84.66, below its 50-day average of $89.47, and below the 200-day at $93.88. It sits at 20% of its 52-week range ($77.60–$112.48); 14-day RSI is 40, in neutral territory; an average session moves it about 1.9%. For levels, the first level overhead is $88.50 (4.5% away) and the first support below is $80.00 (5.5% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 1 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bearish.

MC.PA — LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne

MC.PA trades at $396.90, below its 50-day average of $450.43, and below the 200-day at $502.36. It sits at 0% of its 52-week range ($396.35–$654.70); 14-day RSI is 28, in oversold territory; an average session moves it about 2.5%. For levels, the first level overhead is $400.00 (0.8% away) and the first support below is $375.00 (5.5% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 0 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bearish.

Which one moves harder

MC.PA is the more volatile of the two — an average session moves it 2.5% against 1.9% for 002594.SZ, so an identical position size carries roughly 1.3× the daily risk.

What would change the picture

The comparison turns on those levels: 002594.SZ clearing $88.50 or losing $80.00; MC.PA clearing $400.00 or losing $375.00. Until one of them gives way, the relative reading above stands.

Questions people ask about 002594.SZ vs MC.PA

Which is performing better right now, 002594.SZ or MC.PA?

Over the past month 002594.SZ is -7.3% and MC.PA is -13.6%, so 002594.SZ is ahead on that window. Year to date the figures are -13.4% for 002594.SZ and -38.5% for MC.PA.

Is 002594.SZ or MC.PA more volatile?

MC.PA is the more volatile of the two — an average session moves it 2.5% against 1.9% for 002594.SZ, so an identical position size carries roughly 1.3× the daily risk.

What are the key levels for 002594.SZ and MC.PA?

002594.SZ: resistance $88.50, support $80.00; MC.PA: resistance $400.00, support $375.00. Levels come from recent swing zones and round numbers, recomputed daily.

When do 002594.SZ and MC.PA report next?

002594.SZ: 2025-08-26. MC.PA: 2026-07-27. Earnings reset both the trend and the levels above, so a comparison made today is only good until the next report.

Full technical reads

Related comparisons