0939.HK vs 3988.HK

China Construction Bank against Bank of China Limited — live side-by-side technical comparison.

Prices as of 2026-09-24T06:47:06+00:00 UTC · updates daily

Who leads right now

3988.HK leads 5 of the 5 windows we measure — over 1 month 0939.HK is +5.3% and 3988.HK +9.1%; over year to date 0939.HK is +26.0% and 3988.HK +35.6%. The 0939.HK/3988.HK price ratio stands at 1.5967, below its 50-day average of 1.6467, and below the 200-day average of 1.6823. A ratio above its own average means 0939.HK is gaining on 3988.HK; on this reading the recent edge belongs to 3988.HK.

Performance side by side

0939.HK3988.HK
Price$9.66 $6.05
1 day +0.0% +0.8%lead
5 days -0.1% +1.0%lead
1 month +5.3% +9.1%lead
6 months +21.3% +28.7%lead
Year to date +26.0% +35.6%lead
52-week position 91% of range 96% of range
52-week range $7.18–$9.90 $4.11–$6.14
vs 50-day average above $9.21 above $5.60
vs 200-day average above $8.45 above $5.03
RSI (14) 46 49
Next earnings 2026-10-292026-10-28

Where each one stands

0939.HK — China Construction Bank

0939.HK trades at $9.66, above its 50-day average of $9.21, and above the 200-day at $8.45. It sits at 91% of its 52-week range ($7.18–$9.90); 14-day RSI is 46, in neutral territory; an average session moves it about 2.2%. For levels, the first level overhead is $9.89 (2.4% away) and the first support below is $9.21 (4.7% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 3 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bullish.

3988.HK — Bank of China Limited

3988.HK trades at $6.05, above its 50-day average of $5.60, and above the 200-day at $5.03. It sits at 96% of its 52-week range ($4.11–$6.14); 14-day RSI is 49, in neutral territory; an average session moves it about 2.0%. For levels, the first level overhead is $6.08 (0.5% away) and the first support below is $6.00 (0.8% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 4 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bullish.

Which one moves harder

0939.HK is the more volatile of the two — an average session moves it 2.2% against 2.0% for 3988.HK, so an identical position size carries roughly 1.1× the daily risk.

What would change the picture

The comparison turns on those levels: 0939.HK clearing $9.89 or losing $9.21; 3988.HK clearing $6.08 or losing $6.00. Until one of them gives way, the relative reading above stands.

Questions people ask about 0939.HK vs 3988.HK

Which is performing better right now, 0939.HK or 3988.HK?
Over the past month 0939.HK is +5.3% and 3988.HK is +9.1%, so 3988.HK is ahead on that window. Year to date the figures are +26.0% for 0939.HK and +35.6% for 3988.HK.
Is 0939.HK or 3988.HK more volatile?
0939.HK is the more volatile of the two — an average session moves it 2.2% against 2.0% for 3988.HK, so an identical position size carries roughly 1.1× the daily risk.
What are the key levels for 0939.HK and 3988.HK?
0939.HK: resistance $9.89, support $9.21; 3988.HK: resistance $6.08, support $6.00. Levels come from recent swing zones and round numbers, recomputed daily.
When do 0939.HK and 3988.HK report next?
0939.HK: 2026-10-29. 3988.HK: 2026-10-28. Earnings reset both the trend and the levels above, so a comparison made today is only good until the next report.
What does the 0939.HK/3988.HK ratio mean?
It is simply 0939.HK's price divided by 3988.HK's — 1.5967 today. When the ratio rises, 0939.HK is outperforming; when it falls, 3988.HK is. Comparing it to its own 50- and 200-day averages shows whether the current leadership is new or long-standing.

Full technical reads

0939.HK →
China Construction Bank
Full technical read: trend, levels, chart, news
3988.HK →
Bank of China Limited
Full technical read: trend, levels, chart, news

Related comparisons

BRK-A vs BRK-BBRK-A vs VBRK-A vs MA0939.HK vs BRK-A1288.HK vs BRK-A3988.HK vs BRK-ABRK-A vs CBRK-A vs SAN