0939.HK vs BRK-A

China Construction Bank against Berkshire Hathaway Inc. — live side-by-side technical comparison.

Prices as of 2026-09-23T08:08:12+00:00 UTC · updates daily

Who leads right now

0939.HK leads 4 of the 5 windows we measure — over 1 month 0939.HK is +5.3% and BRK-A +1.2%; over year to date 0939.HK is +25.9% and BRK-A +1.4%.

Performance side by side

0939.HKBRK-A
Price$9.66 $765020.00
1 day -0.9% +1.2%lead
5 days +0.3%lead -2.0%
1 month +5.3%lead +1.2%
6 months +24.0%lead +6.2%
Year to date +25.9%lead +1.4%
52-week position 91% of range 62% of range
52-week range $7.18–$9.90 $698000.00–$806103.00
vs 50-day average above $9.19 above $758366.02
vs 200-day average above $8.44 above $738882.82
RSI (14) 53 54
Next earnings 2026-10-292026-11-07

Where each one stands

0939.HK — China Construction Bank

0939.HK trades at $9.66, above its 50-day average of $9.19, and above the 200-day at $8.44. It sits at 91% of its 52-week range ($7.18–$9.90); 14-day RSI is 53, in neutral territory; an average session moves it about 2.3%. For levels, the first level overhead is $9.89 (2.4% away) and the first support below is $9.19 (4.9% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 4 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bullish.

BRK-A — Berkshire Hathaway Inc.

BRK-A trades at $765,020.00, above its 50-day average of $758,366.02, and above the 200-day at $738,882.82. It sits at 62% of its 52-week range ($698,000.00–$806,103.00); 14-day RSI is 54, in neutral territory; an average session moves it about 1.2%. For levels, the first level overhead is $765,050.00 (0.0% away) and the first support below is $765,000.00 (0.0% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 3 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bullish.

Which one moves harder

0939.HK is the more volatile of the two — an average session moves it 2.3% against 1.2% for BRK-A, so an identical position size carries roughly 1.9× the daily risk.

What would change the picture

The comparison turns on those levels: 0939.HK clearing $9.89 or losing $9.19; BRK-A clearing $765,050.00 or losing $765,000.00. Until one of them gives way, the relative reading above stands.

Questions people ask about 0939.HK vs BRK-A

Which is performing better right now, 0939.HK or BRK-A?
Over the past month 0939.HK is +5.3% and BRK-A is +1.2%, so 0939.HK is ahead on that window. Year to date the figures are +25.9% for 0939.HK and +1.4% for BRK-A.
Is 0939.HK or BRK-A more volatile?
0939.HK is the more volatile of the two — an average session moves it 2.3% against 1.2% for BRK-A, so an identical position size carries roughly 1.9× the daily risk.
What are the key levels for 0939.HK and BRK-A?
0939.HK: resistance $9.89, support $9.19; BRK-A: resistance $765,050.00, support $765,000.00. Levels come from recent swing zones and round numbers, recomputed daily.
When do 0939.HK and BRK-A report next?
0939.HK: 2026-10-29. BRK-A: 2026-11-07. Earnings reset both the trend and the levels above, so a comparison made today is only good until the next report.

Full technical reads

0939.HK →
China Construction Bank
Full technical read: trend, levels, chart, news
BRK-A →
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
Full technical read: trend, levels, chart, news

Related comparisons

BRK-A vs BRK-BBRK-A vs VBRK-A vs MA1288.HK vs BRK-A3988.HK vs BRK-ABRK-A vs CBRK-A vs SANBRK-A vs UCG.MI