0939.HK vs BRK-A

China Construction Bank against Berkshire Hathaway Inc. — live side-by-side technical comparison.

Prices as of 2026-11-06T08:08:50+00:00 UTC · updates daily

Who leads right now

BRK-A leads 3 of the 5 windows we measure — over 1 month 0939.HK is +9.3% and BRK-A +12.7%; over year to date 0939.HK is +37.3% and BRK-A +13.5%.

Performance side by side

0939.HKBRK-A
Price$10.53 $856612.00
1 day +0.5%lead -0.0%
5 days +2.6% +5.0%lead
1 month +9.3% +12.7%lead
6 months +17.9% +21.3%lead
Year to date +37.3%lead +13.5%
52-week position 98% of range 88% of range
52-week range $7.37–$10.58 $698000.00–$878328.00
vs 50-day average above $9.77 above $782627.78
vs 200-day average above $8.77 above $746624.84
RSI (14) 74 73
Next earnings 2026-10-302026-11-07

Where each one stands

0939.HK — China Construction Bank

0939.HK trades at $10.53, above its 50-day average of $9.77, and above the 200-day at $8.77. It sits at 98% of its 52-week range ($7.37–$10.58); 14-day RSI is 74, in overbought territory; an average session moves it about 2.5%. For levels, the first level overhead is $11.00 (4.5% away) and the first support below is $10.00 (5.0% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 6 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bullish.

BRK-A — Berkshire Hathaway Inc.

BRK-A trades at $856,612.00, above its 50-day average of $782,627.78, and above the 200-day at $746,624.84. It sits at 88% of its 52-week range ($698,000.00–$878,328.00); 14-day RSI is 73, in overbought territory; an average session moves it about 1.7%. For levels, the first level overhead is $856,650.00 (0.0% away) and the first support below is $856,600.00 (0.0% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 6 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bullish.

Which one moves harder

0939.HK is the more volatile of the two — an average session moves it 2.5% against 1.7% for BRK-A, so an identical position size carries roughly 1.5× the daily risk.

What would change the picture

The comparison turns on those levels: 0939.HK clearing $11.00 or losing $10.00; BRK-A clearing $856,650.00 or losing $856,600.00. Until one of them gives way, the relative reading above stands.

Questions people ask about 0939.HK vs BRK-A

Which is performing better right now, 0939.HK or BRK-A?
Over the past month 0939.HK is +9.3% and BRK-A is +12.7%, so BRK-A is ahead on that window. Year to date the figures are +37.3% for 0939.HK and +13.5% for BRK-A.
Is 0939.HK or BRK-A more volatile?
0939.HK is the more volatile of the two — an average session moves it 2.5% against 1.7% for BRK-A, so an identical position size carries roughly 1.5× the daily risk.
What are the key levels for 0939.HK and BRK-A?
0939.HK: resistance $11.00, support $10.00; BRK-A: resistance $856,650.00, support $856,600.00. Levels come from recent swing zones and round numbers, recomputed daily.
When do 0939.HK and BRK-A report next?
0939.HK: 2026-10-30. BRK-A: 2026-11-07. Earnings reset both the trend and the levels above, so a comparison made today is only good until the next report.

Full technical briefs

0939.HK →
China Construction Bank
Full technical brief: trend, levels, chart, news
BRK-A →
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
Full technical brief: trend, levels, chart, news

Related comparisons

BRK-A vs BRK-BBRK-A vs JPMBRK-A vs VBRK-A vs MABAC vs BRK-A1288.HK vs BRK-ABRK-A vs MS3988.HK vs BRK-A