0939.HK vs BRK-A

China Construction Bank against Berkshire Hathaway Inc. — live side-by-side technical comparison.

Prices as of 2026-10-09T08:08:06+00:00 UTC · updates daily

Who leads right now

BRK-A leads 3 of the 5 windows we measure — over 1 month 0939.HK is +1.3% and BRK-A +2.0%; over year to date 0939.HK is +26.9% and BRK-A +2.6%.

Performance side by side

0939.HKBRK-A
Price$9.73 $774295.00
1 day +0.7% +1.0%lead
5 days +1.9% +2.6%lead
1 month +1.3% +2.0%lead
6 months +15.2%lead +6.4%
Year to date +26.9%lead +2.6%
52-week position 94% of range 71% of range
52-week range $7.18–$9.90 $698000.00–$806103.00
vs 50-day average above $9.38 above $761572.28
vs 200-day average above $8.54 above $739456.46
RSI (14) 56 69
Next earnings 2026-10-292026-11-07

Where each one stands

0939.HK — China Construction Bank

0939.HK trades at $9.73, above its 50-day average of $9.38, and above the 200-day at $8.54. It sits at 94% of its 52-week range ($7.18–$9.90); 14-day RSI is 56, in neutral territory; an average session moves it about 1.8%. For levels, the first level overhead is $9.88 (1.5% away) and the first support below is $9.38 (3.6% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 5 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bullish.

BRK-A — Berkshire Hathaway Inc.

BRK-A trades at $774,295.00, above its 50-day average of $761,572.28, and above the 200-day at $739,456.46. It sits at 71% of its 52-week range ($698,000.00–$806,103.00); 14-day RSI is 69, in neutral territory; an average session moves it about 0.9%. For levels, the first level overhead is $774,300.00 (0.0% away) and the first support below is $774,250.00 (0.0% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 6 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bullish.

Which one moves harder

0939.HK is the more volatile of the two — an average session moves it 1.8% against 0.9% for BRK-A, so an identical position size carries roughly 2.0× the daily risk.

What would change the picture

The comparison turns on those levels: 0939.HK clearing $9.88 or losing $9.38; BRK-A clearing $774,300.00 or losing $774,250.00. Until one of them gives way, the relative reading above stands.

Questions people ask about 0939.HK vs BRK-A

Which is performing better right now, 0939.HK or BRK-A?
Over the past month 0939.HK is +1.3% and BRK-A is +2.0%, so BRK-A is ahead on that window. Year to date the figures are +26.9% for 0939.HK and +2.6% for BRK-A.
Is 0939.HK or BRK-A more volatile?
0939.HK is the more volatile of the two — an average session moves it 1.8% against 0.9% for BRK-A, so an identical position size carries roughly 2.0× the daily risk.
What are the key levels for 0939.HK and BRK-A?
0939.HK: resistance $9.88, support $9.38; BRK-A: resistance $774,300.00, support $774,250.00. Levels come from recent swing zones and round numbers, recomputed daily.
When do 0939.HK and BRK-A report next?
0939.HK: 2026-10-29. BRK-A: 2026-11-07. Earnings reset both the trend and the levels above, so a comparison made today is only good until the next report.

Full technical reads

0939.HK →
China Construction Bank
Full technical read: trend, levels, chart, news
BRK-A →
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
Full technical read: trend, levels, chart, news

Related comparisons

BRK-A vs BRK-BBRK-A vs VBRK-A vs MA1288.HK vs BRK-A3988.HK vs BRK-ABRK-A vs CBRK-A vs SANBRK-A vs UCG.MI