0939.HK vs GS

China Construction Bank against Goldman Sachs — live side-by-side technical comparison.

Prices as of 2026-10-16T08:08:14+00:00 UTC · updates daily

Who leads right now

0939.HK leads 4 of the 4 windows we measure — over 1 month 0939.HK is +2.4% and GS -6.0%; over year to date 0939.HK is +28.6% and GS +0.3%. The 0939.HK/GS price ratio stands at 0.0111, above its 50-day average of 0.0095. A ratio above its own average means 0939.HK is gaining on GS; on this reading the recent edge belongs to 0939.HK.

Performance side by side

0939.HKGS
Price$9.87 $881.26
1 day -1.1% -1.1%
5 days +1.3%lead -1.6%
1 month +2.4%lead -6.0%
6 months +15.4%lead -2.1%
Year to date +28.6%lead +0.3%
52-week position 95% of range 34% of range
52-week range $7.37–$9.99 $740.01–$1153.99
vs 50-day average above $9.47 below $974.84
vs 200-day average above $8.60 below $959.59
RSI (14) 62 33
Next earnings 2026-10-292026-10-13

Where each one stands

0939.HK — China Construction Bank

0939.HK trades at $9.87, above its 50-day average of $9.47, and above the 200-day at $8.60. It sits at 95% of its 52-week range ($7.37–$9.99); 14-day RSI is 62, in neutral territory; an average session moves it about 1.8%. For levels, the first level overhead is $9.88 (0.1% away) and the first support below is $9.47 (4.0% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 6 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bullish.

GS — Goldman Sachs

GS trades at $881.26, below its 50-day average of $974.84, and below the 200-day at $959.59. It sits at 34% of its 52-week range ($740.01–$1,153.99); 14-day RSI is 33, in neutral territory; an average session moves it about 2.5%. For levels, the first level overhead is $900.00 (2.1% away) and the first support below is $872.74 (1.0% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 2 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bearish.

Which one moves harder

GS is the more volatile of the two — an average session moves it 2.5% against 1.8% for 0939.HK, so an identical position size carries roughly 1.4× the daily risk.

What would change the picture

The comparison turns on those levels: 0939.HK clearing $9.88 or losing $9.47; GS clearing $900.00 or losing $872.74. Until one of them gives way, the relative reading above stands.

Questions people ask about 0939.HK vs GS

Which is performing better right now, 0939.HK or GS?
Over the past month 0939.HK is +2.4% and GS is -6.0%, so 0939.HK is ahead on that window. Year to date the figures are +28.6% for 0939.HK and +0.3% for GS.
Is 0939.HK or GS more volatile?
GS is the more volatile of the two — an average session moves it 2.5% against 1.8% for 0939.HK, so an identical position size carries roughly 1.4× the daily risk.
What are the key levels for 0939.HK and GS?
0939.HK: resistance $9.88, support $9.47; GS: resistance $900.00, support $872.74. Levels come from recent swing zones and round numbers, recomputed daily.
When do 0939.HK and GS report next?
0939.HK: 2026-10-29. GS: 2026-10-13. Earnings reset both the trend and the levels above, so a comparison made today is only good until the next report.
What does the 0939.HK/GS ratio mean?
It is simply 0939.HK's price divided by GS's — 0.0111 today. When the ratio rises, 0939.HK is outperforming; when it falls, GS is. Comparing it to its own 50- and 200-day averages shows whether the current leadership is new or long-standing.

Full technical briefs

0939.HK →
China Construction Bank
Full technical brief: trend, levels, chart, news
GS →
Goldman Sachs
Full technical brief: trend, levels, chart, news

Related comparisons

BRK-A vs BRK-BBRK-B vs JPMBRK-B vs VBRK-B vs MABAC vs BRK-B0939.HK vs BRK-B1288.HK vs BRK-BBRK-B vs MS