0939.HK vs BRK-B

China Construction Bank against Berkshire Hathaway Inc. — live side-by-side technical comparison.

Prices as of 2026-11-06T08:08:50+00:00 UTC · updates daily

Who leads right now

BRK-B leads 3 of the 5 windows we measure — over 1 month 0939.HK is +9.3% and BRK-B +12.8%; over year to date 0939.HK is +37.3% and BRK-B +13.6%. The 0939.HK/BRK-B price ratio stands at 0.0184, below its 50-day average of 0.0186. A ratio above its own average means 0939.HK is gaining on BRK-B; on this reading the recent edge belongs to BRK-B.

Performance side by side

0939.HKBRK-B
Price$10.53 $570.89
1 day +0.5%lead -0.2%
5 days +2.6% +5.2%lead
1 month +9.3% +12.8%lead
6 months +17.9% +21.5%lead
Year to date +37.3%lead +13.6%
52-week position 98% of range 87% of range
52-week range $7.37–$10.58 $464.01–$586.30
vs 50-day average above $9.77 above $521.56
vs 200-day average above $8.77 above $497.72
RSI (14) 74 73
Next earnings 2026-10-302026-11-07

Where each one stands

0939.HK — China Construction Bank

0939.HK trades at $10.53, above its 50-day average of $9.77, and above the 200-day at $8.77. It sits at 98% of its 52-week range ($7.37–$10.58); 14-day RSI is 74, in overbought territory; an average session moves it about 2.5%. For levels, the first level overhead is $11.00 (4.5% away) and the first support below is $10.00 (5.0% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 6 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bullish.

BRK-B — Berkshire Hathaway Inc.

BRK-B trades at $570.89, above its 50-day average of $521.56, and above the 200-day at $497.72. It sits at 87% of its 52-week range ($464.01–$586.30); 14-day RSI is 73, in overbought territory; an average session moves it about 1.8%. For levels, the first level overhead is $579.09 (1.4% away) and the first support below is $550.00 (3.7% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 6 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bullish.

Which one moves harder

0939.HK is the more volatile of the two — an average session moves it 2.5% against 1.8% for BRK-B, so an identical position size carries roughly 1.4× the daily risk.

What would change the picture

The comparison turns on those levels: 0939.HK clearing $11.00 or losing $10.00; BRK-B clearing $579.09 or losing $550.00. Until one of them gives way, the relative reading above stands.

Questions people ask about 0939.HK vs BRK-B

Which is performing better right now, 0939.HK or BRK-B?
Over the past month 0939.HK is +9.3% and BRK-B is +12.8%, so BRK-B is ahead on that window. Year to date the figures are +37.3% for 0939.HK and +13.6% for BRK-B.
Is 0939.HK or BRK-B more volatile?
0939.HK is the more volatile of the two — an average session moves it 2.5% against 1.8% for BRK-B, so an identical position size carries roughly 1.4× the daily risk.
What are the key levels for 0939.HK and BRK-B?
0939.HK: resistance $11.00, support $10.00; BRK-B: resistance $579.09, support $550.00. Levels come from recent swing zones and round numbers, recomputed daily.
When do 0939.HK and BRK-B report next?
0939.HK: 2026-10-30. BRK-B: 2026-11-07. Earnings reset both the trend and the levels above, so a comparison made today is only good until the next report.
What does the 0939.HK/BRK-B ratio mean?
It is simply 0939.HK's price divided by BRK-B's — 0.0184 today. When the ratio rises, 0939.HK is outperforming; when it falls, BRK-B is. Comparing it to its own 50- and 200-day averages shows whether the current leadership is new or long-standing.

Full technical briefs

0939.HK →
China Construction Bank
Full technical brief: trend, levels, chart, news
BRK-B →
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
Full technical brief: trend, levels, chart, news

Related comparisons

BRK-A vs BRK-BBRK-A vs JPMBRK-A vs VBRK-A vs MA0939.HK vs BRK-ABAC vs BRK-A1288.HK vs BRK-ABRK-A vs MS