0939.HK vs UCG.MI

China Construction Bank against UniCredit S.p.A. — live side-by-side technical comparison.

Prices as of 2026-10-13T08:08:26+00:00 UTC · updates daily

Who leads right now

0939.HK leads 4 of the 5 windows we measure — over 1 month 0939.HK is +2.1% and UCG.MI -9.6%; over year to date 0939.HK is +29.9% and UCG.MI +8.6%.

Performance side by side

0939.HKUCG.MI
Price$9.96 $77.00
1 day +0.5% +1.0%lead
5 days +3.2%lead -5.1%
1 month +2.1%lead -9.6%
6 months +18.3%lead +12.9%
Year to date +29.9%lead +8.6%
52-week position 100% of range 68% of range
52-week range $7.29–$9.96 $57.36–$86.42
vs 50-day average above $9.41 below $82.86
vs 200-day average above $8.57 above $75.04
RSI (14) 58 33
Next earnings 2026-10-292026-11-09

Where each one stands

0939.HK — China Construction Bank

0939.HK trades at $9.96, above its 50-day average of $9.41, and above the 200-day at $8.57. It sits at 100% of its 52-week range ($7.29–$9.96); 14-day RSI is 58, in neutral territory; an average session moves it about 1.8%. For levels, the first level overhead is $10.00 (0.4% away) and the first support below is $9.88 (0.8% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 6 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bullish.

UCG.MI — UniCredit S.p.A.

UCG.MI trades at $77.00, below its 50-day average of $82.86, and above the 200-day at $75.04. It sits at 68% of its 52-week range ($57.36–$86.42); 14-day RSI is 33, in neutral territory; an average session moves it about 2.8%. For levels, the first level overhead is $80.00 (3.9% away) and the first support below is $75.70 (1.7% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 2 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bearish.

Which one moves harder

UCG.MI is the more volatile of the two — an average session moves it 2.8% against 1.8% for 0939.HK, so an identical position size carries roughly 1.6× the daily risk.

What would change the picture

The comparison turns on those levels: 0939.HK clearing $10.00 or losing $9.88; UCG.MI clearing $80.00 or losing $75.70. Until one of them gives way, the relative reading above stands.

Questions people ask about 0939.HK vs UCG.MI

Which is performing better right now, 0939.HK or UCG.MI?
Over the past month 0939.HK is +2.1% and UCG.MI is -9.6%, so 0939.HK is ahead on that window. Year to date the figures are +29.9% for 0939.HK and +8.6% for UCG.MI.
Is 0939.HK or UCG.MI more volatile?
UCG.MI is the more volatile of the two — an average session moves it 2.8% against 1.8% for 0939.HK, so an identical position size carries roughly 1.6× the daily risk.
What are the key levels for 0939.HK and UCG.MI?
0939.HK: resistance $10.00, support $9.88; UCG.MI: resistance $80.00, support $75.70. Levels come from recent swing zones and round numbers, recomputed daily.
When do 0939.HK and UCG.MI report next?
0939.HK: 2026-10-29. UCG.MI: 2026-11-09. Earnings reset both the trend and the levels above, so a comparison made today is only good until the next report.

Full technical briefs

0939.HK →
China Construction Bank
Full technical brief: trend, levels, chart, news
UCG.MI →
UniCredit S.p.A.
Full technical brief: trend, levels, chart, news

Related comparisons

BRK-A vs BRK-BBRK-B vs VBRK-B vs MA0939.HK vs BRK-B1288.HK vs BRK-B3988.HK vs BRK-BBRK-B vs CBRK-B vs SAN