0939.HK vs UCG.MI

China Construction Bank against UniCredit S.p.A. — live side-by-side technical comparison.

Prices as of 2026-09-24T06:47:06+00:00 UTC · updates daily

Performance side by side

	0939.HK	UCG.MI
Price	$9.66	$83.47
1 day	+0.0%	+0.2%lead
5 days	-0.1%	+0.7%lead
1 month	+5.3%lead	-0.8%
6 months	+21.3%	+35.5%lead
Year to date	+26.0%lead	+17.7%
52-week position	91% of range	90% of range
52-week range	$7.18–$9.90	$57.36–$86.42
vs 50-day average	above $9.21	above $83.40
vs 200-day average	above $8.45	above $74.27
RSI (14)	46	46
Next earnings	2026-10-29	2026-10-22

Where each one stands

0939.HK — China Construction Bank

0939.HK trades at $9.66, above its 50-day average of $9.21, and above the 200-day at $8.45. It sits at 91% of its 52-week range ($7.18–$9.90); 14-day RSI is 46, in neutral territory; an average session moves it about 2.2%. For levels, the first level overhead is $9.89 (2.4% away) and the first support below is $9.21 (4.7% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 3 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bullish.

UCG.MI — UniCredit S.p.A.

UCG.MI trades at $83.47, above its 50-day average of $83.40, and above the 200-day at $74.27. It sits at 90% of its 52-week range ($57.36–$86.42); 14-day RSI is 46, in neutral territory; an average session moves it about 2.3%. For levels, the first level overhead is $83.70 (0.3% away) and the first support below is $83.40 (0.1% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 4 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bullish.

Which one moves harder

Both move about the same amount day to day (2.2% and 2.3% of price), so the same position size carries comparable risk in either.

What would change the picture

The comparison turns on those levels: 0939.HK clearing $9.89 or losing $9.21; UCG.MI clearing $83.70 or losing $83.40. Until one of them gives way, the relative reading above stands.

Questions people ask about 0939.HK vs UCG.MI

Which is performing better right now, 0939.HK or UCG.MI?

Over the past month 0939.HK is +5.3% and UCG.MI is -0.8%, so 0939.HK is ahead on that window. Year to date the figures are +26.0% for 0939.HK and +17.7% for UCG.MI.

Is 0939.HK or UCG.MI more volatile?

Both move about the same amount day to day (2.2% and 2.3% of price), so the same position size carries comparable risk in either.

What are the key levels for 0939.HK and UCG.MI?

0939.HK: resistance $9.89, support $9.21; UCG.MI: resistance $83.70, support $83.40. Levels come from recent swing zones and round numbers, recomputed daily.

When do 0939.HK and UCG.MI report next?

0939.HK: 2026-10-29. UCG.MI: 2026-10-22. Earnings reset both the trend and the levels above, so a comparison made today is only good until the next report.

Full technical reads

Related comparisons