COST vs MNST

Costco against Monster Beverage — live side-by-side technical comparison.

Prices as of 2026-10-16T20:00:02+00:00 UTC · updates daily

Who leads right now

MNST leads 3 of the 5 windows we measure — over 1 month COST is +10.7% and MNST +2.6%; over year to date COST is +14.7% and MNST +19.3%. The COST/MNST price ratio stands at 21.6293, above its 50-day average of 20.8987, and below the 200-day average of 22.8531. A ratio above its own average means COST is gaining on MNST; on this reading the recent edge belongs to COST.

Performance side by side

COSTMNST
Price$989.11 $45.73
1 day +1.1%lead +0.9%
5 days +4.5% +4.8%lead
1 month +10.7%lead +2.6%
6 months +0.2% +21.4%lead
Year to date +14.7% +19.3%lead
52-week position 57% of range 74% of range
52-week range $844.06–$1096.50 $32.94–$50.17
vs 50-day average above $933.79 above $44.73
vs 200-day average above $966.12 above $42.68
RSI (14) 79 80
Next earnings 2026-12-102026-11-05

Where each one stands

COST — Costco

COST trades at $989.11, above its 50-day average of $933.79, and above the 200-day at $966.12. It sits at 57% of its 52-week range ($844.06–$1,096.50); 14-day RSI is 79, in overbought territory; an average session moves it about 1.6%. For levels, the first level overhead is $1,000.00 (1.1% away) and the first support below is $986.10 (0.3% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 5 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bullish.

MNST — Monster Beverage

MNST trades at $45.73, above its 50-day average of $44.73, and above the 200-day at $42.68. It sits at 74% of its 52-week range ($32.94–$50.17); 14-day RSI is 80, in overbought territory; an average session moves it about 2.1%. For levels, the first level overhead is $49.49 (8.2% away) and the first support below is $45.28 (1.0% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 6 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bullish.

Which one moves harder

MNST is the more volatile of the two — an average session moves it 2.1% against 1.6% for COST, so an identical position size carries roughly 1.3× the daily risk.

What would change the picture

The comparison turns on those levels: COST clearing $1,000.00 or losing $986.10; MNST clearing $49.49 or losing $45.28. Until one of them gives way, the relative reading above stands.

Questions people ask about COST vs MNST

Which is performing better right now, COST or MNST?
Over the past month COST is +10.7% and MNST is +2.6%, so COST is ahead on that window. Year to date the figures are +14.7% for COST and +19.3% for MNST.
Is COST or MNST more volatile?
MNST is the more volatile of the two — an average session moves it 2.1% against 1.6% for COST, so an identical position size carries roughly 1.3× the daily risk.
What are the key levels for COST and MNST?
COST: resistance $1,000.00, support $986.10; MNST: resistance $49.49, support $45.28. Levels come from recent swing zones and round numbers, recomputed daily.
When do COST and MNST report next?
COST: 2026-12-10. MNST: 2026-11-05. Earnings reset both the trend and the levels above, so a comparison made today is only good until the next report.
What does the COST/MNST ratio mean?
It is simply COST's price divided by MNST's — 21.6293 today. When the ratio rises, COST is outperforming; when it falls, MNST is. Comparing it to its own 50- and 200-day averages shows whether the current leadership is new or long-standing.

Full technical briefs

COST →
Costco
Full technical brief: trend, levels, chart, news
MNST →
Monster Beverage
Full technical brief: trend, levels, chart, news

Related comparisons

COST vs WMTKO vs WMTPG vs WMTPM vs WMTNESN.SW vs WMTPEP vs WMTMO vs WMTBATS.L vs WMT