COST vs WMT

Costco against Walmart Inc. — live side-by-side technical comparison.

Prices as of 2026-11-06T21:00:01+00:00 UTC · updates daily

Who leads right now

COST leads 4 of the 5 windows we measure — over 1 month COST is +11.8% and WMT +16.1%; over year to date COST is +22.2% and WMT +12.7%. The COST/WMT price ratio stands at 8.3936, below its 50-day average of 8.4773, and above the 200-day average of 8.2157. A ratio above its own average means COST is gaining on WMT; on this reading the recent edge belongs to WMT.

Performance side by side

COSTWMT
Price$1053.56 $125.52
1 day -1.1%lead -1.7%
5 days +4.1%lead +1.6%
1 month +11.8% +16.1%lead
6 months +5.8%lead -3.5%
Year to date +22.2%lead +12.7%
52-week position 83% of range 73% of range
52-week range $844.06–$1096.50 $98.88–$135.16
vs 50-day average above $952.41 above $112.48
vs 200-day average above $972.82 above $118.71
RSI (14) 64 63
Next earnings 2026-12-102026-11-19

Where each one stands

COST — Costco

COST trades at $1,053.56, above its 50-day average of $952.41, and above the 200-day at $972.82. It sits at 83% of its 52-week range ($844.06–$1,096.50); 14-day RSI is 64, in neutral territory; an average session moves it about 2.0%. For levels, the first level overhead is $1,094.32 (3.9% away) and the first support below is $1,050.00 (0.3% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 5 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bullish.

WMT — Walmart Inc.

WMT trades at $125.52, above its 50-day average of $112.48, and above the 200-day at $118.71. It sits at 73% of its 52-week range ($98.88–$135.16); 14-day RSI is 63, in neutral territory; an average session moves it about 2.6%. For levels, the first level overhead is $126.49 (0.8% away) and the first support below is $125.00 (0.4% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 5 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bullish.

Which one moves harder

WMT is the more volatile of the two — an average session moves it 2.6% against 2.0% for COST, so an identical position size carries roughly 1.3× the daily risk.

What would change the picture

The comparison turns on those levels: COST clearing $1,094.32 or losing $1,050.00; WMT clearing $126.49 or losing $125.00. Until one of them gives way, the relative reading above stands.

Questions people ask about COST vs WMT

Which is performing better right now, COST or WMT?
Over the past month COST is +11.8% and WMT is +16.1%, so WMT is ahead on that window. Year to date the figures are +22.2% for COST and +12.7% for WMT.
Is COST or WMT more volatile?
WMT is the more volatile of the two — an average session moves it 2.6% against 2.0% for COST, so an identical position size carries roughly 1.3× the daily risk.
What are the key levels for COST and WMT?
COST: resistance $1,094.32, support $1,050.00; WMT: resistance $126.49, support $125.00. Levels come from recent swing zones and round numbers, recomputed daily.
When do COST and WMT report next?
COST: 2026-12-10. WMT: 2026-11-19. Earnings reset both the trend and the levels above, so a comparison made today is only good until the next report.
What does the COST/WMT ratio mean?
It is simply COST's price divided by WMT's — 8.3936 today. When the ratio rises, COST is outperforming; when it falls, WMT is. Comparing it to its own 50- and 200-day averages shows whether the current leadership is new or long-standing.

Full technical briefs

COST →
Costco
Full technical brief: trend, levels, chart, news
WMT →
Walmart Inc.
Full technical brief: trend, levels, chart, news

Related comparisons

KO vs WMTPG vs WMTPM vs WMTNESN.SW vs WMTPEP vs WMTMO vs WMTBATS.L vs WMTMNST vs WMT