LOW vs MC.PA

Lowe's against LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne — live side-by-side technical comparison.

Prices as of 2026-11-03T21:00:02+00:00 UTC · updates daily

Who leads right now

LOW leads 4 of the 5 windows we measure — over 1 month LOW is +18.0% and MC.PA +6.1%; over year to date LOW is -11.5% and MC.PA -37.8%. The LOW/MC.PA price ratio stands at 0.5433, above its 50-day average of 0.4837. A ratio above its own average means LOW is gaining on MC.PA; on this reading the recent edge belongs to LOW.

Performance side by side

LOWMC.PA
Price$213.38 $401.50
1 day -2.2% +2.0%lead
5 days +7.7%lead +3.4%
1 month +18.0%lead +6.1%
6 months -8.6%lead -11.1%
Year to date -11.5%lead -37.8%
52-week position 30% of range 9% of range
52-week range $178.45–$293.06 $375.65–$654.70
vs 50-day average above $196.15 below $403.35
vs 200-day average below $225.34 below $467.77
RSI (14) 73 61
Next earnings 2026-11-182026-07-27

Where each one stands

LOW — Lowe's

LOW trades at $213.38, above its 50-day average of $196.15, and below the 200-day at $225.34. It sits at 30% of its 52-week range ($178.45–$293.06); 14-day RSI is 73, in overbought territory; an average session moves it about 2.7%. For levels, the first level overhead is $219.86 (3.0% away) and the first support below is $200.00 (6.3% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 4 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bullish.

MC.PA — LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne

MC.PA trades at $401.50, below its 50-day average of $403.35, and below the 200-day at $467.77. It sits at 9% of its 52-week range ($375.65–$654.70); 14-day RSI is 61, in neutral territory; an average session moves it about 2.2%. For levels, the first level overhead is $403.35 (0.5% away) and the first support below is $400.00 (0.4% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 3 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is mixed.

Which one moves harder

LOW is the more volatile of the two — an average session moves it 2.7% against 2.2% for MC.PA, so an identical position size carries roughly 1.2× the daily risk.

What would change the picture

The comparison turns on those levels: LOW clearing $219.86 or losing $200.00; MC.PA clearing $403.35 or losing $400.00. Until one of them gives way, the relative reading above stands.

Questions people ask about LOW vs MC.PA

Which is performing better right now, LOW or MC.PA?
Over the past month LOW is +18.0% and MC.PA is +6.1%, so LOW is ahead on that window. Year to date the figures are -11.5% for LOW and -37.8% for MC.PA.
Is LOW or MC.PA more volatile?
LOW is the more volatile of the two — an average session moves it 2.7% against 2.2% for MC.PA, so an identical position size carries roughly 1.2× the daily risk.
What are the key levels for LOW and MC.PA?
LOW: resistance $219.86, support $200.00; MC.PA: resistance $403.35, support $400.00. Levels come from recent swing zones and round numbers, recomputed daily.
When do LOW and MC.PA report next?
LOW: 2026-11-18. MC.PA: 2026-07-27. Earnings reset both the trend and the levels above, so a comparison made today is only good until the next report.
What does the LOW/MC.PA ratio mean?
It is simply LOW's price divided by MC.PA's — 0.5433 today. When the ratio rises, LOW is outperforming; when it falls, MC.PA is. Comparing it to its own 50- and 200-day averages shows whether the current leadership is new or long-standing.

Full technical briefs

LOW →
Lowe's
Full technical brief: trend, levels, chart, news
MC.PA →
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
Full technical brief: trend, levels, chart, news

Related comparisons

AMZN vs TSLAAMZN vs HD9988.HK vs AMZNAMZN vs BABAAMZN vs MC.PAAMZN vs ITX.MCAMZN vs MCDAMZN vs TJX