0939.HK vs WFC

China Construction Bank against Wells Fargo — live side-by-side technical comparison.

Prices as of 2026-11-05T08:08:15+00:00 UTC · updates daily

Who leads right now

0939.HK leads 5 of the 5 windows we measure — over 1 month 0939.HK is +8.6% and WFC +4.0%; over year to date 0939.HK is +36.6% and WFC -9.0%. The 0939.HK/WFC price ratio stands at 0.1199, above its 50-day average of 0.1131. A ratio above its own average means 0939.HK is gaining on WFC; on this reading the recent edge belongs to 0939.HK.

Performance side by side

0939.HKWFC
Price$10.48 $84.80
1 day +2.2%lead -3.0%
5 days +3.5%lead -0.0%
1 month +8.6%lead +4.0%
6 months +19.4%lead +6.2%
Year to date +36.6%lead -9.0%
52-week position 98% of range 48% of range
52-week range $7.37–$10.55 $72.78–$97.76
vs 50-day average above $9.75 above $84.42
vs 200-day average above $8.75 above $83.55
RSI (14) 67 53
Next earnings 2026-10-302027-01-14

Where each one stands

0939.HK — China Construction Bank

0939.HK trades at $10.48, above its 50-day average of $9.75, and above the 200-day at $8.75. It sits at 98% of its 52-week range ($7.37–$10.55); 14-day RSI is 67, in neutral territory; an average session moves it about 2.4%. For levels, the first level overhead is $11.00 (5.0% away) and the first support below is $10.00 (4.6% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 6 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bullish.

WFC — Wells Fargo

WFC trades at $84.80, above its 50-day average of $84.42, and above the 200-day at $83.55. It sits at 48% of its 52-week range ($72.78–$97.76); 14-day RSI is 53, in neutral territory; an average session moves it about 2.5%. For levels, the first level overhead is $86.46 (2.0% away) and the first support below is $84.42 (0.5% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 4 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bullish.

Which one moves harder

Both move about the same amount day to day (2.4% and 2.5% of price), so the same position size carries comparable risk in either.

What would change the picture

The comparison turns on those levels: 0939.HK clearing $11.00 or losing $10.00; WFC clearing $86.46 or losing $84.42. Until one of them gives way, the relative reading above stands.

Questions people ask about 0939.HK vs WFC

Which is performing better right now, 0939.HK or WFC?
Over the past month 0939.HK is +8.6% and WFC is +4.0%, so 0939.HK is ahead on that window. Year to date the figures are +36.6% for 0939.HK and -9.0% for WFC.
Is 0939.HK or WFC more volatile?
Both move about the same amount day to day (2.4% and 2.5% of price), so the same position size carries comparable risk in either.
What are the key levels for 0939.HK and WFC?
0939.HK: resistance $11.00, support $10.00; WFC: resistance $86.46, support $84.42. Levels come from recent swing zones and round numbers, recomputed daily.
When do 0939.HK and WFC report next?
0939.HK: 2026-10-30. WFC: 2027-01-14. Earnings reset both the trend and the levels above, so a comparison made today is only good until the next report.
What does the 0939.HK/WFC ratio mean?
It is simply 0939.HK's price divided by WFC's — 0.1199 today. When the ratio rises, 0939.HK is outperforming; when it falls, WFC is. Comparing it to its own 50- and 200-day averages shows whether the current leadership is new or long-standing.

Full technical briefs

0939.HK →
China Construction Bank
Full technical brief: trend, levels, chart, news
WFC →
Wells Fargo
Full technical brief: trend, levels, chart, news

Related comparisons

BRK-A vs BRK-BBRK-A vs JPMBRK-A vs VBRK-A vs MA0939.HK vs BRK-ABAC vs BRK-A1288.HK vs BRK-ABRK-A vs MS