BAC vs WFC

Bank of America against Wells Fargo — live side-by-side technical comparison.

Prices as of 2026-11-05T21:00:02+00:00 UTC · updates daily

Who leads right now

WFC leads 5 of the 5 windows we measure — over 1 month BAC is -8.0% and WFC +4.0%; over year to date BAC is -9.5% and WFC -9.0%. The BAC/WFC price ratio stands at 0.5868, below its 50-day average of 0.6567, and below the 200-day average of 0.6571. A ratio above its own average means BAC is gaining on WFC; on this reading the recent edge belongs to WFC.

Performance side by side

BACWFC
Price$49.76 $84.80
1 day -3.6% -3.0%lead
5 days -2.7% -0.0%lead
1 month -8.0% +4.0%lead
6 months -6.3% +6.2%lead
Year to date -9.5% -9.0%lead
52-week position 19% of range 48% of range
52-week range $46.12–$65.23 $72.78–$97.76
vs 50-day average below $55.48 above $84.42
vs 200-day average below $54.91 above $83.55
RSI (14) 41 53
Next earnings 2027-01-152027-01-14

Where each one stands

BAC — Bank of America

BAC trades at $49.76, below its 50-day average of $55.48, and below the 200-day at $54.91. It sits at 19% of its 52-week range ($46.12–$65.23); 14-day RSI is 41, in neutral territory; an average session moves it about 2.5%. For levels, the first level overhead is $50.00 (0.5% away) and the first support below is $49.28 (1.0% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 2 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bearish.

WFC — Wells Fargo

WFC trades at $84.80, above its 50-day average of $84.42, and above the 200-day at $83.55. It sits at 48% of its 52-week range ($72.78–$97.76); 14-day RSI is 53, in neutral territory; an average session moves it about 2.5%. For levels, the first level overhead is $86.46 (2.0% away) and the first support below is $84.42 (0.5% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 4 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bullish.

Which one moves harder

Both move about the same amount day to day (2.5% and 2.5% of price), so the same position size carries comparable risk in either.

What would change the picture

The comparison turns on those levels: BAC clearing $50.00 or losing $49.28; WFC clearing $86.46 or losing $84.42. Until one of them gives way, the relative reading above stands.

Questions people ask about BAC vs WFC

Which is performing better right now, BAC or WFC?
Over the past month BAC is -8.0% and WFC is +4.0%, so WFC is ahead on that window. Year to date the figures are -9.5% for BAC and -9.0% for WFC.
Is BAC or WFC more volatile?
Both move about the same amount day to day (2.5% and 2.5% of price), so the same position size carries comparable risk in either.
What are the key levels for BAC and WFC?
BAC: resistance $50.00, support $49.28; WFC: resistance $86.46, support $84.42. Levels come from recent swing zones and round numbers, recomputed daily.
When do BAC and WFC report next?
BAC: 2027-01-15. WFC: 2027-01-14. Earnings reset both the trend and the levels above, so a comparison made today is only good until the next report.
What does the BAC/WFC ratio mean?
It is simply BAC's price divided by WFC's — 0.5868 today. When the ratio rises, BAC is outperforming; when it falls, WFC is. Comparing it to its own 50- and 200-day averages shows whether the current leadership is new or long-standing.

Full technical briefs

BAC →
Bank of America
Full technical brief: trend, levels, chart, news
WFC →
Wells Fargo
Full technical brief: trend, levels, chart, news

Related comparisons

BRK-A vs BRK-BBRK-A vs JPMBRK-A vs VBRK-A vs MA0939.HK vs BRK-ABAC vs BRK-A1288.HK vs BRK-ABRK-A vs MS