MA vs WFC

Mastercard Incorporated against Wells Fargo — live side-by-side technical comparison.

Prices as of 2026-11-05T21:00:02+00:00 UTC · updates daily

Who leads right now

MA leads 5 of the 5 windows we measure — over 1 month MA is +15.8% and WFC +4.0%; over year to date MA is +14.9% and WFC -9.0%. The MA/WFC price ratio stands at 7.7349, above its 50-day average of 7.0191, and above the 200-day average of 6.4479. A ratio above its own average means MA is gaining on WFC; on this reading the recent edge belongs to MA.

Performance side by side

MAWFC
Price$655.92 $84.80
1 day -2.5%lead -3.0%
5 days +3.2%lead -0.0%
1 month +15.8%lead +4.0%
6 months +31.9%lead +6.2%
Year to date +14.9%lead -9.0%
52-week position 88% of range 48% of range
52-week range $464.52–$681.99 $72.78–$97.76
vs 50-day average above $591.84 above $84.42
vs 200-day average above $538.19 above $83.55
RSI (14) 64 53
Next earnings 2027-01-282027-01-14

Where each one stands

MA — Mastercard Incorporated

MA trades at $655.92, above its 50-day average of $591.84, and above the 200-day at $538.19. It sits at 88% of its 52-week range ($464.52–$681.99); 14-day RSI is 64, in neutral territory; an average session moves it about 2.3%. For levels, the first level overhead is $672.68 (2.6% away) and the first support below is $650.00 (0.9% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 6 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bullish.

WFC — Wells Fargo

WFC trades at $84.80, above its 50-day average of $84.42, and above the 200-day at $83.55. It sits at 48% of its 52-week range ($72.78–$97.76); 14-day RSI is 53, in neutral territory; an average session moves it about 2.5%. For levels, the first level overhead is $86.46 (2.0% away) and the first support below is $84.42 (0.5% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 4 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bullish.

Which one moves harder

WFC is the more volatile of the two — an average session moves it 2.5% against 2.3% for MA, so an identical position size carries roughly 1.1× the daily risk.

What would change the picture

The comparison turns on those levels: MA clearing $672.68 or losing $650.00; WFC clearing $86.46 or losing $84.42. Until one of them gives way, the relative reading above stands.

Questions people ask about MA vs WFC

Which is performing better right now, MA or WFC?
Over the past month MA is +15.8% and WFC is +4.0%, so MA is ahead on that window. Year to date the figures are +14.9% for MA and -9.0% for WFC.
Is MA or WFC more volatile?
WFC is the more volatile of the two — an average session moves it 2.5% against 2.3% for MA, so an identical position size carries roughly 1.1× the daily risk.
What are the key levels for MA and WFC?
MA: resistance $672.68, support $650.00; WFC: resistance $86.46, support $84.42. Levels come from recent swing zones and round numbers, recomputed daily.
When do MA and WFC report next?
MA: 2027-01-28. WFC: 2027-01-14. Earnings reset both the trend and the levels above, so a comparison made today is only good until the next report.
What does the MA/WFC ratio mean?
It is simply MA's price divided by WFC's — 7.7349 today. When the ratio rises, MA is outperforming; when it falls, WFC is. Comparing it to its own 50- and 200-day averages shows whether the current leadership is new or long-standing.

Full technical briefs

MA →
Mastercard Incorporated
Full technical brief: trend, levels, chart, news
WFC →
Wells Fargo
Full technical brief: trend, levels, chart, news

Related comparisons

BRK-A vs BRK-BBRK-A vs JPMBRK-A vs VBRK-A vs MA0939.HK vs BRK-ABAC vs BRK-A1288.HK vs BRK-ABRK-A vs MS