MS vs WFC

Morgan Stanley against Wells Fargo — live side-by-side technical comparison.

Prices as of 2026-11-05T21:02:57+00:00 UTC · updates daily

Performance side by side

	MS	WFC
Price	$182.44	$84.80
1 day	-5.9%	-3.0%lead
5 days	-4.0%	-0.0%lead
1 month	-4.5%	+4.0%lead
6 months	-3.6%	+6.2%lead
Year to date	+2.8%lead	-9.0%
52-week position	37% of range	48% of range
52-week range	$152.80–$232.25	$72.78–$97.76
vs 50-day average	below $195.85	above $84.42
vs 200-day average	below $194.34	above $83.55
RSI (14)	52	53
Next earnings	2027-01-14	2027-01-14

Where each one stands

MS — Morgan Stanley

MS trades at $182.44, below its 50-day average of $195.85, and below the 200-day at $194.34. It sits at 37% of its 52-week range ($152.80–$232.25); 14-day RSI is 52, in neutral territory; an average session moves it about 3.3%. For levels, the first level overhead is $185.67 (1.8% away) and the first support below is $182.22 (0.1% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 2 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bearish.

WFC — Wells Fargo

WFC trades at $84.80, above its 50-day average of $84.42, and above the 200-day at $83.55. It sits at 48% of its 52-week range ($72.78–$97.76); 14-day RSI is 53, in neutral territory; an average session moves it about 2.5%. For levels, the first level overhead is $86.46 (2.0% away) and the first support below is $84.42 (0.5% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 4 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bullish.

Which one moves harder

MS is the more volatile of the two — an average session moves it 3.3% against 2.5% for WFC, so an identical position size carries roughly 1.3× the daily risk.

What would change the picture

The comparison turns on those levels: MS clearing $185.67 or losing $182.22; WFC clearing $86.46 or losing $84.42. Until one of them gives way, the relative reading above stands.

Questions people ask about MS vs WFC

Which is performing better right now, MS or WFC?

Over the past month MS is -4.5% and WFC is +4.0%, so WFC is ahead on that window. Year to date the figures are +2.8% for MS and -9.0% for WFC.

Is MS or WFC more volatile?

MS is the more volatile of the two — an average session moves it 3.3% against 2.5% for WFC, so an identical position size carries roughly 1.3× the daily risk.

What are the key levels for MS and WFC?

MS: resistance $185.67, support $182.22; WFC: resistance $86.46, support $84.42. Levels come from recent swing zones and round numbers, recomputed daily.

When do MS and WFC report next?

MS: 2027-01-14. WFC: 2027-01-14. Earnings reset both the trend and the levels above, so a comparison made today is only good until the next report.

What does the MS/WFC ratio mean?

It is simply MS's price divided by WFC's — 2.1514 today. When the ratio rises, MS is outperforming; when it falls, WFC is. Comparing it to its own 50- and 200-day averages shows whether the current leadership is new or long-standing.

Full technical briefs

Related comparisons