QQQI — NEOS NASDAQ-100(R) High Income ETF (ETF)

Price: $50.45 · 1 day: -1.12% · 5 days: -1.68% · 1 month: -10.34% · YTD: -6.33%
As of 2026-11-10 17:24 UTC.

52-week range: $47.87 – $57.84 (currently at 26% of the range).

The brief

QQQI is in a downtrend, momentum soft. $51.09 is the level overhead; $50 the first support below.

5 of 6 technical checks lean bearish.

TrendDowntrend · below 50-day & below 200-day
MomentumRSI 38.0 · MACD bearish
Trend strengthADX 36.4 · strong trend
Location-6.8% vs 50-day MA
52-week range-13% from high · +5% from low
VolatilityATR 1.19 · ~2.4%/day

Key levels

LevelTypeDistance
$51.09 (resistance)swing zone1.27%
$51.75 (resistance)swing zone2.58%
$53.3 (resistance)swing zone5.65%
$50.0 (support)round-0.89%
$48.12 (support)52w low-4.62%
$40.0 (support)round-20.71%

Indicators

RSI (14)38.05MACD-1.2396
ADX (14)36.4ATR (14)1.19
50-day average$54.14200-day average$54.05

NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI) stock analysis, November 10, 2026: bearish medium‑conviction on downside breakout

Report of 2026-11-10.

QQQI slipped to $51.02 on November 10, a 3.1% rise on the day but still down 9.3% over the past month and 10% from its October 6 peak of $56.66. The fund sits below both its 50‑day ($54.22) and 200‑day ($54.06) simple moving averages, confirming a longer‑term downtrend. With the daily trend echoing the weekly decline and lagging the S&P 500 by 4.3% over 50 days, the balance of evidence points to a bearish outlook for the next two to six weeks.

Why it matters

The ETF tracks a basket of high‑income Nasdaq‑100 stocks, a theme that has been under pressure as growth‑oriented capital rotates toward value and rate‑sensitive sectors. The recent 10% drop from the October 6 high reflects that rotation, and the market’s reaction was largely in line with expectations; there were no surprise news items to trigger a larger move.

Over the past five days the fund fell 5.9% while the S&P 500 rose 0.08%, indicating that the broader market was not the primary driver of the decline. The 5‑day attribution shows a negative contribution from the ETF itself (-5.9%) versus a modest positive drift in the benchmark (+0.08%). No sector‑specific ETF data are available, so the move appears to be driven by the basket’s own dynamics rather than a sector rally or bleed.

Debate among market participants centers on whether the high‑income tilt can sustain outperformance in a rate‑hiking environment. One view argues that the dividend yield provides a floor, citing the fund’s recent volume spike of 4.1% above the 20‑day average as evidence of buyer interest. The opposing view points to the fund’s price still below its 40‑week average and the widening gap to the S&P 500 as signs that the theme is losing favor. Both arguments rely on the same price data and therefore do not shift the overall assessment.

There is no analyst consensus or target range published for QQQI, so valuation comparisons are unavailable. The lack of external price targets reinforces the need to rely on price action and structural levels.

What the evidence says

The long‑term thesis that a high‑income Nasdaq basket can outperform in a sideways market remains intact, but the price is now in a weakening phase, sitting below key moving averages and the 52‑week low of $48.12 is still 6% away. For the next two to six weeks the evidence leans negative: the assessment calls for a bearish stance with medium conviction, based on the daily trend aligning with the weekly downtrend and a 4.3% underperformance versus the S&P 500 over 50 days.

The strongest counter‑argument is the recent 3.1% daily gain, suggesting short‑term buying pressure. However, that gain is modest compared with the broader downtrend and does not overcome the negative alignment or the swing‑zone resistance at $51.48, keeping conviction at medium rather than high.

Levels that matter

The structure holds the price above the swing‑zone level of $51.48, a zone where sellers have previously stepped in on rallies. The weekly trend would be considered ended if the price closes above $53.30, another swing‑zone resistance.

The breakout math looks for a daily close below the round level of $50.00. The stop is set at $51.77, derived from $51.48 plus a quarter of the 14‑day ATR ($1.18). The primary target is the 52‑week low of $48.12, offering a reward‑to‑risk of about 1.1. Because the reward‑to‑risk does not reach 3 to 1, the math does not meet the preferred risk‑reward threshold; a price move to roughly $46.5 would be needed to achieve a 3 to 1 profile, which is not currently on the map.

What would change the picture

A weekly close above $53.30 would break the swing‑zone resistance and signal the end of the weekly downtrend. Any substantial inflow into the high‑income Nasdaq basket, such as a large institutional allocation, would also shift the narrative.

What to watch

Explore more

Interactive QQQI chart and analyst chat · Market terminal — movers, signals and news · Use MarketCrew inside Claude · Use MarketCrew inside ChatGPT · Top gainers today · 52-week highs