QSX — Investment Managers Series Trust II - Tradr 2x Long QS Daily ETF (ETF)

Price: $12.42 · 1 day: +0.00% · 5 days: +0.00% · 1 month: -0.06% · YTD: -0.06%
As of 2026-01-23 18:22 UTC.

52-week range: $11.85 – $44.19 (currently at 2% of the range).

The brief

QSX is in a range / mixed, momentum firm. $13 is the level overhead; $12.27 the first support below.

2 of 4 technical checks lean bearish.

TrendRange / mixed · below 50-day
MomentumRSI 44.2 · n/a · MACD bullish
Trend strengthADX 9.0 · weak or range
Location-16.7% vs 50-day MA
52-week range-72% from high · +2% from low
VolatilityATR 0.19 · ~1.5%/day

Key levels

LevelTypeDistance
$13.0 (resistance)round4.67%
$14.0 (resistance)round12.72%
$14.52 (resistance)swing zone16.91%
$12.27 (support)swing zone-1.21%
$12.22 (support)52w low-1.61%
$12.0 (support)round-3.38%

Indicators

RSI (14)44.2MACD-0.9142
ADX (14)9.0ATR (14)0.19
50-day average$14.92200-day average

Investment Managers Series Trus (QSX) stock analysis, January 24, 2026: QSX fell 66.66% from $37.25 to $12.42 — is the leveraged thesis dead for good?

Report of 2026-01-24.

Key Updates

Investment Managers Series Trust (QSX) has experienced a catastrophic price collapse of 66.66% since the October 2025 report, declining from $37.25 to $12.42. This severe drawdown completely invalidates the previous bullish thesis centered on leveraged ETF momentum and transforms the investment profile from speculative growth to value recovery. The broader ETF industry continues rapid expansion with over 1,000 new U.S. launches in 2025 and $13.5 trillion in total assets, though concerns about complex product proliferation and value destruction in leveraged instruments have intensified.

Current Trend

QSX trades at $12.42, down 66.66% from the prior report level of $37.25, representing a complete reversal of the previous rally. Year-to-date performance shows a marginal decline of 0.06%, indicating the bulk of losses occurred in Q4 2025. Recent price action shows short-term stabilization with a 1.64% gain over five days, though the one-month decline of 13.29% suggests continued weakness. The current price represents a 66.7% decline from the October peak, establishing new support levels far below previous technical formations. The dramatic repricing reflects either fundamental deterioration in underlying ETF holdings or a collapse in the speculative premium that drove the October surge.

Investment Thesis

The investment thesis has fundamentally shifted from leveraged growth to distressed value recovery. Investment Managers Series Trust operates as an umbrella trust for various ETF strategies, with exposure to the rapidly expanding but increasingly scrutinized leveraged and complex ETF segment. The industry backdrop remains constructive, with ETF assets reaching $13.5 trillion and $3 trillion flowing from mutual funds to ETFs between 2015-2024. However, the same Wall Street Journal analysis highlights that leveraged funds have destroyed value through volatility decay, directly impacting trust vehicles holding such instruments. The current valuation at $12.42 may reflect either liquidation of underperforming leveraged positions or a market reassessment of complex ETF wrapper structures. Recovery potential depends on whether the trust can pivot toward established index-tracking products that offer genuine investor value, or whether structural issues in the leveraged ETF holdings will continue to erode capital.

Thesis Status

The original thesis has been completely invalidated. The October 2025 analysis anticipated continued momentum in leveraged ETF products, but the subsequent 66.66% collapse demonstrates that volatility decay and complex product risks materialized catastrophically. The current situation aligns with broader industry warnings about leveraged funds destroying value and newer ETF offerings relying on gimmicks rather than substantive investment utility. The trust's positioning in complex, leveraged instruments—precisely the segment facing heightened regulatory and investor scrutiny—has proven disastrous. A new thesis would require evidence of portfolio restructuring away from high-risk leveraged products toward established, low-cost index strategies, or confirmation that the price collapse created a significant discount to net asset value that provides a margin of safety.

Key Drivers

The primary driver is the ongoing proliferation and subsequent performance failure of complex ETF products. Tradr's expansion to 62 leveraged ETFs with over $2 billion in assets and 58 leveraged ETFs following 47 launches in 2025 demonstrates continued industry supply, but the market now contains more ETFs than individual stocks, with many newer offerings presenting significant risks including potential total loss of investment. The launch of 2x leveraged single-stock ETFs like EOSU and managed-risk overlay products like HQQQ indicates the industry is simultaneously expanding leverage products while developing downside protection strategies—a contradictory dynamic suggesting market recognition of leverage risks. If QSX holds concentrated positions in underperforming leveraged instruments, the 66.66% decline likely reflects both volatility decay and redemption pressures as sophisticated investors exit these vehicles.

Technical Analysis

QSX has established a new technical regime at $12.42, representing a 66.7% decline from the $37.25 level in October 2025. The year-to-date performance of -0.06% indicates the current price approximates early January 2026 levels, suggesting the catastrophic decline occurred primarily in November-December 2025. Recent price action shows nascent stabilization with a 1.64% five-day gain following a 0.26% single-day decline, though the one-month drawdown of 13.29% indicates continued distribution. The previous resistance at $37.25 now represents a distant overhead supply level, while immediate support appears at current levels around $12.40. The magnitude of the decline suggests either a fundamental repricing event or forced liquidation, with no established technical patterns at current levels. Volume and momentum data would be required to assess whether the recent stabilization represents capitulation or temporary consolidation before further declines.

Bull Case

Bear Case

Earlier QSX analyses

Latest QSX news

Explore more

Interactive QSX chart and analyst chat · Market terminal — movers, signals and news · Use MarketCrew inside Claude · Use MarketCrew inside ChatGPT · Top gainers today · 52-week highs