Price: $33.66
· 1 day: -1.25% · 5 days: -1.85% · 1 month: -8.40% · YTD: +3.17%
As of 2026-11-10 17:24 UTC.
52-week range: $27.96 – $37.1 (currently at 62% of the range).
SCHG is turning up, momentum soft. $34.84 is the level overhead; $33.5 the first support below.
4 of 6 technical checks lean bearish.
| Trend | Turning up · below 50-day & 200-day |
|---|---|
| Momentum | RSI 40.4 · MACD bearish |
| Trend strength | ADX 29.3 · strong trend |
| Location | -5.1% vs 50-day MA |
| 52-week range | -9% from high · +20% from low |
| Volatility | ATR 0.77 · ~2.3%/day |
| Level | Type | Distance |
|---|---|---|
| $34.84 (resistance) | swing zone | 3.52% |
| $35.0 (resistance) | round | 4.0% |
| $35.45 (resistance) | sma 50 | 5.33% |
| $33.5 (support) | sma 200 | -0.46% |
| $33.16 (support) | swing zone | -1.47% |
| $32.53 (support) | swing zone | -3.34% |
| RSI (14) | 40.38 | MACD | -0.5895 |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADX (14) | 29.3 | ATR (14) | 0.77 |
| 50-day average | $35.45 | 200-day average | $33.5 |
Report of 2026-11-09.
Schwab U.S. Large‑Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) slipped to $33.14 on Friday, a 1.0% rise on the day but still down 3.4% over the past five sessions and 10.1% from its October peak of $36.93. The daily move follows a weekly downtrend that keeps the price below its 40‑week average, and the fund is lagging the S&P 500 by 2.8% on a 50‑day basis. The balance of evidence points to a bearish outlook for the next two to six weeks, with medium conviction, because the price is poised to break a swing‑zone support at $32.53 and the math does not offer a 3‑to‑1 reward‑to‑risk ratio.
The ETF’s recent weakness reflects the broader rotation out of growth‑oriented large‑cap equities as investors reassess earnings outlooks in a higher‑for‑long rate environment. SCHG’s exposure to high‑multiple tech and consumer‑discretionary names makes it sensitive to that shift, and the 5‑day attribution shows the fund fell 3.44% while the S&P 500 slipped 2.70%, indicating the basket is under‑performing the market. No specific news item drove the move; the decline is a continuation of the weekly downtrend that has kept the price below both the 50‑day SMA ($35.52) and the 200‑day SMA ($33.48).
Market participants have already priced in the expectation that growth ETFs will under‑perform the broader index. The volume on Friday was 36.1% of the 20‑day average, a modest uptick that suggests some short‑term trading interest but not a decisive flow shift. Because there were no headline events, the price action is largely a technical response to the swing‑zone resistance at $33.16 and the broader downtrend.
The debate around SCHG centers on two points. One side argues that the ETF remains a core growth exposure and that the recent dip offers a buying opportunity once the price stabilises above the 200‑day SMA. The other side points to the persistent under‑performance versus the S&P 500 and the failure to break above the swing‑zone resistance, suggesting that further downside is likely. Both arguments rely on the same data: the fund’s 5‑day lag of –2.8% versus the index, the price sitting 10.3% below its recent high, and the RSI at 33.9, which is approaching oversold territory.
Valuation metrics are not directly applicable to an ETF, but the fund’s composition mirrors the growth premium that has been compressed over the past year. The lack of any catalyst in the news feed means the move is driven by technical factors rather than a shift in fundamentals, reinforcing the bearish technical bias.
On the long‑term horizon, SCHG’s thesis of delivering growth‑biased exposure remains intact, but the price is now in a down‑trend phase, sitting below its 40‑week average and failing to hold above the 200‑day SMA. The weekly trend is clearly down, and the price is testing a swing‑zone support that has held since early October.
For the next two to six weeks, the balance of evidence leans negative. The assessment calls for a bearish stance with medium conviction, based on two of four conviction points: the daily trend running with the weekly downtrend and the fund lagging the S&P 500 by 2.8% over 50 days. The conviction is not higher because the price has shown a modest 1.0% daily gain and the volume is only modestly elevated, leaving room for a short‑term bounce.
The strongest case against a bearish reading would be a rapid reversal that pushes the price above the 200‑day SMA at $33.48, coupled with a surge in inflows that lifts the fund above its swing‑zone resistance. However, such a move would require a weekly close above $33.48, which has not materialised, and the current price action does not support that scenario.
The structure holds the price above the swing‑zone support at $33.16, a level where sellers have historically stepped in on rallies. A break below the lower swing‑zone support at $32.53 would signal that the downtrend is intact and that the weekly trend would likely continue. The trend would be considered ended only if the ETF closes a week above the 200‑day SMA at $33.48.
The breakout math targets a move to $31.65 as the first objective and $31.06 as the second, both derived from the swing‑zone support. The stop is set at $33.34, calculated as $33.16 plus a quarter of the 14‑day ATR ($0.73). The reward‑to‑risk ratio for the first target is 1.1 and for the second is 1.8, which falls short of the 3‑to‑1 threshold. A price move to roughly $30.00 would be needed to achieve a 3‑to‑1 profile, a level that is still below the current support zone.
A weekly close above the 200‑day SMA at $33.48 would alter the technical picture, indicating that the downtrend may be losing momentum. The non‑price factor that could trigger such a shift would be a significant net inflow into growth‑oriented ETFs, reflecting a macro‑level change in risk appetite.
Interactive SCHG chart and analyst chat · Market terminal — movers, signals and news · Use MarketCrew inside Claude · Use MarketCrew inside ChatGPT · Top gainers today · 52-week highs