VPL — Vanguard FTSE Pacific Index Fund ETF Shares (ETF)

Price: $103.14 · 1 day: +0.46% · 5 days: -5.12% · 1 month: -11.38% · YTD: +14.09%
As of 2026-11-06 21:00 UTC.

52-week range: $87.16 – $121.23 (currently at 47% of the range).

The brief

VPL is in a downtrend, momentum soft. $108.86 is the level overhead; $100 the first support below.

5 of 6 technical checks lean bearish.

TrendDowntrend · below 50-day & below 200-day
MomentumRSI 29.27 · bearish · MACD bearish
Trend strengthADX 27.2 · strong trend
Location-9.3% vs 50-day MA
52-week range-15% from high · +18% from low
VolatilityATR 1.99 · ~1.9%/day

Key levels

LevelTypeDistance
$108.86 (resistance)swing zone5.55%
$109.5 (resistance)sma 2006.17%
$113.24 (resistance)swing zone9.79%
$100.0 (support)round-3.04%
$87.18 (support)52w low-15.47%
$75.0 (support)round-27.28%

Indicators

RSI (14)29.27MACD-2.2981
ADX (14)27.2ATR (14)1.99
50-day average$113.71200-day average$109.5

VPL breaks below key support, weekly trend turns down

Report of 2026-11-05.

Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) fell 2.8% on November 5, 2026, to $106.35, extending a five-day slide of 4.4% that has pushed the fund below its 200-day average and the swing zone at $108.86. The weekly trend has now turned down, and the balance of evidence for the next 2–6 weeks leans negative with medium conviction. The move is not just market noise: VPL has lagged the S&P 500 by 6.0 percentage points over the last 50 days, and the breakdown below $108.86 opens the door to a test of the 52-week low near $87.18.

Why it matters

VPL tracks a basket of Pacific-region equities, with heavy weightings in Japan, Australia, and other developed Asian markets. The fund’s recent decline is not a single-stock story; it reflects a broad regional selloff that has been building for weeks. Since peaking at $118.40 on October 5, 2026, VPL has dropped 10.2%, while the S&P 500 has fallen only 1.1% over the past five days. The fund’s 50-day relative performance against SPY is -6.0%, and its 200-day relative performance is -6.8%, showing persistent underperformance that has now turned into a technical breakdown.

The market’s reaction to the news flow has been muted—there are no specific catalysts in the headlines, and the only backdrop item is a Reuters note from September 22 about Indian shares opening higher on easing oil prices and bond yields. That story is stale and does not explain the current move. The decline appears to be driven by broader risk-off sentiment in the Pacific region, possibly tied to currency moves, trade tensions, or a reassessment of growth prospects. The fund’s 1-month return of -9.6% versus SPY’s -2.3% shows that the selling is concentrated in the Pacific basket, not just a market-wide dip.

The debate among investors is whether this is a cyclical pullback within a longer-term uptrend or the start of a new downtrend. On the bullish side, the fund is still up 17.6% year-to-date, well ahead of SPY’s 11.6%, and the 52-week range shows a low of $87.18, implying a 22% upside from current levels if that low holds. On the bearish side, the price has broken below the 200-day average at $109.48 and the swing zone at $108.86, both of which had provided support on rallies. The RSI at 40.31 is not yet oversold, suggesting more downside could be ahead. The lack of analyst coverage (no consensus or target) means there is no valuation anchor to debate; the technicals are the primary guide.

What the evidence says

The long-term trend has shifted from up to down. VPL is now below its 40-week average, and the weekly trend is aligned with the daily downtrend. The previous assessment on October 28, 2026, called the stance neutral with low conviction, noting that the price was above its 40-week average and that a weekly close below $109.08 would be the key level to watch. That level has now been breached—the price closed below $109.48 (the 200-day SMA) and is trading at $106.35, well below the swing zone. The thesis that the uptrend was intact is weakened, and the structure now favors sellers.

For the next 2–6 weeks, the balance of evidence leans negative. The daily trend runs with the weekly downtrend, and the fund is lagging the S&P 500 by 6.0% over 50 days. The conviction is medium, not high, because the move has not yet reached oversold conditions (RSI at 40.31) and the 52-week low at $87.18 is still 18% away. The strongest case against the bearish reading is that the drop from the peak is only 10.2%, and the fund is still up 21.99% from its 52-week low, suggesting that buyers could step in at the round $100 level. However, the breakdown below $108.86 is a clear signal that sellers have taken control, and the lack of any positive catalyst in the news flow does not tip the balance back to neutral.

Levels that matter

The structure holds below $108.86, the swing zone where sellers have shown up on rallies. As long as the price stays below that level, the path of least resistance is down. The trend would end on a weekly close above $109.48, the 200-day average, which would signal that buyers have regained control. Below $108.86, the next support is the round $100.00 level, followed by the 52-week low at $87.18.

The breakout level for a downside move is a daily close below $100.00. From there, the target is the 52-week low at $87.18, which gives a reward-to-risk of 1.4 to 1 against a stop at $109.3 (based on the swing zone plus a quarter of ATR). That does not meet the 3-to-1 threshold that would make the trade compelling. To reach 3-to-1, the target would need to be closer to $80, or the stop would need to be tighter. As it stands, the math is not attractive enough to justify a high-conviction bearish call, which is why conviction is only medium.

What would change the picture

A weekly close above $109.48 would flip the picture back to neutral or positive, as it would put the price back above the 200-day average and negate the downside breakout. The one non-price fact that could change the picture is a shift in regional sentiment, such as a resolution to trade tensions or a surprise policy move from a major Pacific central bank, which could trigger a sharp rebound. Until then, the bearish structure remains intact.

What to watch

Earlier VPL analyses

Latest VPL news

Explore more

Interactive VPL chart and analyst chat · Market terminal — movers, signals and news · Use MarketCrew inside Claude · Use MarketCrew inside ChatGPT · Top gainers today · 52-week highs