GLEN.L vs SHW

Glencore plc against Sherwin-Williams — live side-by-side technical comparison.

Prices as of 2026-10-16T16:15:00+00:00 UTC · updates daily

Who leads right now

GLEN.L leads 3 of the 5 windows we measure — over 1 month GLEN.L is +2.1% and SHW +4.3%; over year to date GLEN.L is +43.4% and SHW +3.5%. The GLEN.L/SHW price ratio stands at 1.7307, above its 50-day average of 1.7015, and above the 200-day average of 1.5585. A ratio above its own average means GLEN.L is gaining on SHW; on this reading the recent edge belongs to GLEN.L.

Performance side by side

GLEN.LSHW
Price$583.10 $335.20
1 day +1.6%lead -0.5%
5 days -0.3% +5.0%lead
1 month +2.1% +4.3%lead
6 months +4.5%lead +0.6%
Year to date +43.4%lead +3.5%
52-week position 67% of range 52% of range
52-week range $332.20–$707.20 $289.86–$377.77
vs 50-day average above $577.14 above $334.17
vs 200-day average above $543.56 above $333.16
RSI (14) 68 52
Next earnings 2026-08-052026-10-27

Where each one stands

GLEN.L — Glencore plc

GLEN.L trades at $583.10, above its 50-day average of $577.14, and above the 200-day at $543.56. It sits at 67% of its 52-week range ($332.20–$707.20); 14-day RSI is 68, in neutral territory; an average session moves it about 3.9%. For levels, the first level overhead is $598.33 (2.6% away) and the first support below is $578.62 (0.8% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 5 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bullish.

SHW — Sherwin-Williams

SHW trades at $335.20, above its 50-day average of $334.17, and above the 200-day at $333.16. It sits at 52% of its 52-week range ($289.86–$377.77); 14-day RSI is 52, in neutral territory; an average session moves it about 2.4%. For levels, the first level overhead is $337.92 (0.8% away) and the first support below is $334.17 (0.3% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 5 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bullish.

Which one moves harder

GLEN.L is the more volatile of the two — an average session moves it 3.9% against 2.4% for SHW, so an identical position size carries roughly 1.6× the daily risk.

What would change the picture

The comparison turns on those levels: GLEN.L clearing $598.33 or losing $578.62; SHW clearing $337.92 or losing $334.17. Until one of them gives way, the relative reading above stands.

Questions people ask about GLEN.L vs SHW

Which is performing better right now, GLEN.L or SHW?
Over the past month GLEN.L is +2.1% and SHW is +4.3%, so SHW is ahead on that window. Year to date the figures are +43.4% for GLEN.L and +3.5% for SHW.
Is GLEN.L or SHW more volatile?
GLEN.L is the more volatile of the two — an average session moves it 3.9% against 2.4% for SHW, so an identical position size carries roughly 1.6× the daily risk.
What are the key levels for GLEN.L and SHW?
GLEN.L: resistance $598.33, support $578.62; SHW: resistance $337.92, support $334.17. Levels come from recent swing zones and round numbers, recomputed daily.
When do GLEN.L and SHW report next?
GLEN.L: 2026-08-05. SHW: 2026-10-27. Earnings reset both the trend and the levels above, so a comparison made today is only good until the next report.
What does the GLEN.L/SHW ratio mean?
It is simply GLEN.L's price divided by SHW's — 1.7307 today. When the ratio rises, GLEN.L is outperforming; when it falls, SHW is. Comparing it to its own 50- and 200-day averages shows whether the current leadership is new or long-standing.

Full technical briefs

GLEN.L →
Glencore plc
Full technical brief: trend, levels, chart, news
SHW →
Sherwin-Williams
Full technical brief: trend, levels, chart, news

Related comparisons

BHP vs LINLIN vs RIOLIN vs NEMFCX vs LINGLEN.L vs LINLIN vs SHWECL vs LINAPD vs LIN