0939.HK vs BAC

China Construction Bank against Bank of America — live side-by-side technical comparison.

Prices as of 2026-10-16T08:08:14+00:00 UTC · updates daily

Who leads right now

0939.HK leads 4 of the 5 windows we measure — over 1 month 0939.HK is +2.4% and BAC -11.5%; over year to date 0939.HK is +28.6% and BAC -6.8%. The 0939.HK/BAC price ratio stands at 0.1908, above its 50-day average of 0.1572. A ratio above its own average means 0939.HK is gaining on BAC; on this reading the recent edge belongs to 0939.HK.

Performance side by side

0939.HKBAC
Price$9.87 $51.23
1 day -1.1% -0.9%lead
5 days +1.3%lead -5.7%
1 month +2.4%lead -11.5%
6 months +15.4%lead -4.3%
Year to date +28.6%lead -6.8%
52-week position 95% of range 27% of range
52-week range $7.37–$9.99 $46.12–$65.23
vs 50-day average above $9.47 below $59.05
vs 200-day average above $8.60 below $55.20
RSI (14) 62 22
Next earnings 2026-10-292027-01-15

Where each one stands

0939.HK — China Construction Bank

0939.HK trades at $9.87, above its 50-day average of $9.47, and above the 200-day at $8.60. It sits at 95% of its 52-week range ($7.37–$9.99); 14-day RSI is 62, in neutral territory; an average session moves it about 1.8%. For levels, the first level overhead is $9.88 (0.1% away) and the first support below is $9.47 (4.0% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 6 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bullish.

BAC — Bank of America

BAC trades at $51.23, below its 50-day average of $59.05, and below the 200-day at $55.20. It sits at 27% of its 52-week range ($46.12–$65.23); 14-day RSI is 22, in oversold territory; an average session moves it about 2.4%. For levels, the first level overhead is $51.67 (0.9% away) and the first support below is $50.66 (1.1% down). On the checklist the page runs for every asset, 1 of 6 checks read bullish — the lean is bearish.

Which one moves harder

BAC is the more volatile of the two — an average session moves it 2.4% against 1.8% for 0939.HK, so an identical position size carries roughly 1.3× the daily risk.

What would change the picture

The comparison turns on those levels: 0939.HK clearing $9.88 or losing $9.47; BAC clearing $51.67 or losing $50.66. Until one of them gives way, the relative reading above stands.

Questions people ask about 0939.HK vs BAC

Which is performing better right now, 0939.HK or BAC?
Over the past month 0939.HK is +2.4% and BAC is -11.5%, so 0939.HK is ahead on that window. Year to date the figures are +28.6% for 0939.HK and -6.8% for BAC.
Is 0939.HK or BAC more volatile?
BAC is the more volatile of the two — an average session moves it 2.4% against 1.8% for 0939.HK, so an identical position size carries roughly 1.3× the daily risk.
What are the key levels for 0939.HK and BAC?
0939.HK: resistance $9.88, support $9.47; BAC: resistance $51.67, support $50.66. Levels come from recent swing zones and round numbers, recomputed daily.
When do 0939.HK and BAC report next?
0939.HK: 2026-10-29. BAC: 2027-01-15. Earnings reset both the trend and the levels above, so a comparison made today is only good until the next report.
What does the 0939.HK/BAC ratio mean?
It is simply 0939.HK's price divided by BAC's — 0.1908 today. When the ratio rises, 0939.HK is outperforming; when it falls, BAC is. Comparing it to its own 50- and 200-day averages shows whether the current leadership is new or long-standing.

Full technical briefs

0939.HK →
China Construction Bank
Full technical brief: trend, levels, chart, news
BAC →
Bank of America
Full technical brief: trend, levels, chart, news

Related comparisons

BRK-A vs BRK-BBRK-B vs JPMBRK-B vs VBRK-B vs MABAC vs BRK-B0939.HK vs BRK-B1288.HK vs BRK-BBRK-B vs MS